The 2027 political contest for the Degema/Bonny Federal Constituency is taking on a new dimension as the candidacy of Dr. Gloria Boma Harry of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) sparks debate over gender inclusion, political representation and the need for a change in leadership narrative.
Supporters of Harry say her aspiration goes beyond another electoral contest, arguing that the constituency needs to critically examine the quality of representation it has received over the years and consider whether a different leadership approach is required.
They contend that Degema and Bonny have continued to grapple with concerns over neglect, inadequate representation and the failure to fully translate the constituency’s enormous resources and potential into meaningful development.
A major point being raised is the possibility of Harry becoming the first woman from the constituency to represent Degema/Bonny at the National Assembly in this capacity, if elected.
Her emergence, supporters argue, could therefore mark a significant shift in the political history of the constituency and provide an opportunity to test whether female leadership can offer a different approach to addressing longstanding challenges.
However, those backing her candidacy stress that the argument should not be about electing a woman simply because she is a woman. Rather, they say Harry should be assessed on her competence, character, vision, capacity and commitment to the people.
The campaign is also drawing attention to the political strength of women, who constitute a significant portion of the electorate but remain underrepresented in positions where decisions affecting their communities are made.
Supporters are consequently asking whether women can convert their numerical strength at the polling booth into greater participation and influence in political leadership.
The debate has equally revived concerns about political godfatherism, with advocates of Harry’s candidacy insisting that political mandates should belong to the electorate and not to individuals or political interests that seek to determine who represents the people.
They argue that Degema and Bonny need a representative capable of listening to the concerns of riverine communities and taking issues such as infrastructure, education, healthcare, livelihoods, employment and economic development to the National Assembly.
For her supporters, the ultimate test is whether Harry can provide the kind of people-centred representation they believe the constituency has been lacking.
Her candidacy, they maintain, should therefore be viewed not merely through the lens of gender, but as a wider test of whether the people are prepared to demand competence, accountability and effective representation over political influence.
As the political contest gathers momentum, the question confronting voters may ultimately be bigger than “Why Gloria?”
It is whether Degema and Bonny are ready for a new political narrative—and whether, after years of male representation, the electorate is willing to give a woman the opportunity to prove that leadership can be defined differently.
For her supporters, the message is simple: Let the people decide. Let merit prevail. Let the people come first.
